From 04:00 PM CDT – 08:00 PM CDT (09:00 PM UTC – 01:00 AM UTC) Tuesday, April 16, ni.com will undergo system upgrades that may result in temporary service interruption.

We appreciate your patience as we improve our online experience.

LabVIEW Development Best Practices Documents

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Data Communication in LabVIEW Technical Seminar

Summary

This session will provide an overview of some of the most effective techniques for sending and receiving data and commands within a LabVIEW application.  See how to stop multiple loops, send messages to an undefined number of plug-ins, setup two-way communication, how to communicate in a distributed embedded system, and address other common challenges.

 

Related Links

Asynchronous Message Communication Reference Library

Configuring Software and Hardware Firewalls to Support National Instruments Products

Current Value Table Communication Reference Library

Deterministic Communication Between Targets

Lossless Communication with Network Streams: Components, Architecture, and Performance

Web Services in LabVIEW

Using the Right Network Protocol

Application Design Patterns: Producer Consumer

Elijah Kerry
NI Director, Software Community
Comments
viScience
Active Participant
Active Participant
on
No mention of the fact that NSV's give you PSP functionality which provides powerful features such as NSV<->NSV binding, NSV<->GUI binding and NSV events. Also, the DSC is heavily invested in the use of NSV's for such things as citadel data logging. If NI wants so badly for us to give up the nasty NSV habit then stop making it so tempting to use. Or better yet - give us a PSP interface that fixes some of the problems with NSV's such as buffering, scoping, poor local transaction efficiency, etc Also give us another way to easily log data to citadel.