@Kevin_Price wrote:
I haven't tried doing things the way Jeff Bohrer just suggested, but it immediately makes my spidey sense tingle and say, "oooh, that sounds like a better way to go...". It makes a nice line of separation between fixed executable code and editable configuration settings.
-Kevin P
Its especially nice when some wire tech, who is fully eye-dee-ten-tee qualified, miss-wires a repair and you need to swap channel names and order within a task without rebuilding.
"Should be" isn't "Is" -Jay
