Real-Time Measurement and Control

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

How do I set strain gauge resistance on 9237

This link should be helpful  

Charlie M. CLD
Message 41 of 67
(4,330 Views)
So does that mean that the project has been tested? You guys wouldn't put it on the support site without testing it on a crio system hooked up to strain gauges would you?
---------------------------------
[will work for kudos]
0 Kudos
Message 42 of 67
(4,320 Views)

The code was tested with a 120 Ohm gauge and a quarter bridge completion accessory.

Smiley Wink

Charlie M. CLD
Message 43 of 67
(4,315 Views)
Charlie , your calibration example works flawlessly. I can't thank you enough. Your infinite patience is refreshing.

Can you pretty please, with a cherry on top, modify this example to log data continuously? Please? I have been struggling for a long time (since I started this thread) trying to write a VI that aquires continuously. I keep getting invalid data from the module with the programs I have written. I have opened a few support threads and the app engineers keep telling me that my code looks fine. Which, of course, makes no sense because it doesn't work. Even if you just posted something that was unofficial it would really help me out. I am using the same configuration you  programmed the "Shuntoffset" example for. I am using a 120 Ohm gauge and a quarter bridge completion accessory.

I don't want anything amazing, I just want to be able to calibrate and then log data continously. I feel that the example VI for this module should be doing that already. NI saying that the reason they didn't provide one is because every person's situation is different is a cop out. You know perfectly well that any differences in the system could be user selectable controls that change the VI. Anyways, none of that is your fault of course charlie. I guess I am just venting my frustrations about my troubles.

I really appreciate all your help so far. Thanks again.

Sincerely,

Kyle


---------------------------------
[will work for kudos]
0 Kudos
Message 44 of 67
(4,295 Views)
Kyle,

Please try the following example.  You'll have to modify it from the 9233 to the 9237 but it should be as simple as switching the module in the project and ensuring the IO are named the same.  Any chance you have the Service Request numbers for the issues you where having?  It would be nice to be able to follow up the the Engineers that were helping out to make sure the information is received by everyone.

Regards,

Bassett Hound
Message 45 of 67
(4,281 Views)
I have been using the example program in this discussion forum and it looks like it works great. The offset and null compensation give me correct values as far as I know. I do have two questions:

1. In the "NI 9237 Example for Shunt Cal and Offset Cal" under the Developer Zone, a note states that "You should perform an offset null compensation just before you perform a shunt calibration." Can someone explain to me how to do this?

2. When I run the calibration program multiple times in a row, the offset values seem to increase little by little. Is this typical?

Thanks,
Jimmy P.
Message 46 of 67
(4,193 Views)

.



Message Edited by pauloeduardo@maxioncr.com.br on 03-04-2008 12:11 PM
Message 47 of 67
(4,174 Views)

.



Message Edited by pauloeduardo@maxioncr.com.br on 03-04-2008 12:11 PM
Message 48 of 67
(4,173 Views)

.



Message Edited by pauloeduardo@maxioncr.com.br on 03-04-2008 12:12 PM
Message 49 of 67
(4,172 Views)

.



Message Edited by pauloeduardo@maxioncr.com.br on 03-04-2008 12:13 PM
Message 50 of 67
(4,171 Views)