09-17-2013 12:59 PM
How much interest is there in discussing code repositories and maintaining and distributing "released code" ?
I have found that I can end up spending time on these issues, especially if I want to work on the source code at two or more locations, and my client doesn't use a repository application.
My thoughts would be for 3 - 4 of the group to discuss/present some solutions or tips/tricks or administrative techniques that make saving and modifying code, with clients/team members/managers more solid and less painful.
Mark
09-17-2013 01:13 PM
Sounds great Mark. Let's discuss this at the conclusion of the UGM tomorrow.
We'll have an open time to propose topics & encourage presenters (volunteers welcome!) for the next mtg.
Will love to see/hear the group's response... Thx! -drew
09-17-2013 01:48 PM
If a customer does not have a repository, I have to use my own, if they don't want to have a repository and not use Source Code Control then I will not work with them. Source code control is crucial!
I think this would be a great topic and I like the idea of doing more as a discussion.
Here is a true story I used to ilustrate the importance of Source Code Control:
See you Wednesday!
Fab
09-18-2013 07:14 AM
I would love to see this topic explored more. I am especially interested in any experience anyone has had with LabVIEW and distributed source code control (e.g. git or mercurial). Looking forward to it.
10-23-2013 11:58 AM
Bump! Looking form more interested parties that would like to give some of their code repository experiences in a round table format with 3 - 5 others. The ext meetign is comign up soon, so send or post your interests.
10-23-2013 02:50 PM
You know I love to talk I can help with this if you want or I can give a chance to others who have not presented yet.
11-12-2013 01:55 PM
I can be on the panel. This would be Thursday the 21st correct?
Charles
11-12-2013 03:30 PM
Yes, Next Thursday
1)Name of favorite repository.
2)One best practice for using the repository with LabVIEW. Is this different because LabVIEW is not Text based? Is this a work around because LabVIEW is not "supported" by the repository?
For example, Does your repository branch and can it merge LabVIEW?
3) How important are the comments used when updating source?
4) Do you use labels or some other marker for released application (not just a VI , but the application level)
5) Do you like to use branching, are there some pitfalls?
6) Do you share the code base with other developers? Does the repository support your team practices or do you have some work arounds?
7) How well does it support you working at different locations?
😎 Describe one pain point in your favorite repository
9) Describe one winning quality of your repository
Please comment on these questions or add as desired.
Reply with your interest to be in the round table and/or send me or Drew an email. We are really looking to get more of the group talking, especially those who might be new to using Repositories!
11-12-2013 09:20 PM
Sorry I will miss it. I will be out of town the week of November 18.
I will miss you
Fab
11-13-2013 10:07 AM
As an Engineer/programmer, not an engineer/Programmer some really basic questions that come to my mind.
Respects to Fabiola, but as a non-SCC , individual , occasional 'programmer', and maybe not the target audience of the Austin UG, what's a Repository, and why should I care?
It seems obvious to me that 'hello world' doesn't qualify as benefiting from SCC (unless you're gonna thoroughly geek out on it with bells and whistles). When does this become useful? (follow up to above)
What security is available? Mostly I've seen repositories for FOSS development. I'm assuming it's available, but I don't see it mentioned. Is it by user permissions? Encryption? Shredded and burned every night?
Regards,
Mark