05-07-2009 05:26 PM
Dear all
Could anyone help me how to solve the attached problem. I have ODE solver but when I connected my subvi to its input F(x,t), I have an error"the type of sink is strictly refrence vi"
so how can I convert the subvi to be strictly typed refrence
Thanks
05-07-2009 08:08 PM
05-07-2009 08:12 PM
I meant to add (too quick on the submit post button):
You're hooking it up your data to the wrong terminal. You have it hooked up to the ODE F(X,t) terminal, and it should be the data terminal.
I haven't used this function, but I suspect you will have other problems since you don't have any of the other inputs hooked up -- hence the suggestion to read the help.
05-08-2009 07:09 AM
I just connect one input as an example. My main problem is how to convert the subvi to be stictly typed refrence???
I sent this problem morea nd more. why no one can solve it for me??? is it complex????
05-08-2009 08:26 AM
To get a strict type reference to a VI, drop a "Static VI Reference" from the application control palette. Right-click on it, choose "Browse for path...", select your VI, then right-click on the static reference again and choose "Strictly Typed VI Reference." That will get you a reference to a specific VI, which is what you want here, I think.
05-08-2009 08:44 AM
Dear
Did you mean by "static vi refernce" from the application control that:
select classic refnum and then application refnum or somthing else could you indicate it for me how to find it in the control platelett??
Thanks and I'm waiting
05-08-2009 08:53 AM
You need to look in the programming palette, on the block diagram, not in the controls palette on the front panel.
05-08-2009 11:36 AM - edited 05-08-2009 11:39 AM
First, place it down from the pallet.
Browse for the path to the VI you want to reference.
Change it from a generic reference to a strict typed. Look for the star to know you have a strict type reference.
05-08-2009 11:53 AM
Dear All
Thanks very very much for helping me. Yes I made it .
05-08-2009 09:40 PM
Eng.Ahmad wrote:
I sent this problem morea nd more. why no one can solve it for me??? is it complex????
Out of curiosity, you said something just like this in another completely unrelated thread here. In that thread you said you attached files before. In this thread, your English says something that could be interpreted in a similar manner to that. Neither thread is related. And none of any of your other threads seem to have anything to do with either of these. If I'm mistaken, then please point out another thread where you asked the same question and did not get an answer.
Otherwise comments like this come across as a bit annoying and reflect an impatience that makes no sense if you haven't ever asked the question before.