Multifunction DAQ

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

USB6008 output

Solved!
Go to solution

Hi,

 

I have been asked to plot the voltage output of the USB-6008 vs the input of the NI-9234. The cards are linked together, so the NI-9234 should read exactly what the USB-6008 sends it to.

 

But there is a strange phenomenom that happens, the NI-9234 is unable to read the signal under 3.5mV. I do not know where this is coming from, do you have any ideas?

 

Could this be from the USB-6008, or the NI-9234?

 

On my graph, the white line is the signal that i am sending to the usb-6008 (ideal signal) and the red is the input of the NI-9234.

 

Thank you

partie3-capture_valide1.jpg 

0 Kudos
Message 1 of 3
(3,159 Views)

Take a deep look into the spec of the 6008, without doing so , I assume the output offset of this cheap device is in full spec 😉

 

Greetings from Germany
Henrik

LV since v3.1

“ground” is a convenient fantasy

'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'


0 Kudos
Message 2 of 3
(3,145 Views)
Solution
Accepted by Dibbs

Hi Dibbs,

 

We are looking at a couple things here - the AO accuracy of the 6008, the AI accuracy of the 9234, and the  use case of the 9234.  The 9234 is a DSA device so is it is optimized for acceleration and vibration measurements - not low frequency/DC measurements.  The offset error of the 9234 is 7.1 mV and the absolute accuracy of the 6008 AO is 7 mV, up to 34 mV at full scale. One thing you could try doing is using the AI of the 6008 to characterize the 6008 AO or use a device optimized for DC measurements, like a DMM.

 

6008 AO Specs

 

9234 Accuracy Specs

Regards,
Jim Schwartz
Message 3 of 3
(3,136 Views)